FEMINISM, AS AN IDEOLOGICAL WEAPON OF GLOBALISM


Феминизм, как идеологическое оружие глобализма

“We have severed the ties between parent and child, between man and woman, between one person and another. No one trusts his wife, his child, his friend. And soon and wives, and friends not will. Children will be taken from the mother, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated.”J. Orwell, 1984

Feminism is perhaps the most destructive ideology in the modern world. This ideology does not kill people. It kills civilizations. Many political commentators believe that feminism is responsible for the ongoing dismantling of European culture and traditional values. Thanks to feminism, Europe and the United States are increasingly flooded with migrants from culturally alien countries against the background of the rejection of their own culture. The birth rate is falling, the institution of the traditional family is being destroyed. Men and women are increasingly moving away from each other.



But feminism is women’s struggle for equality?

Not really. Modern feminism has long gone beyond its dictionary definition. Today’s feminist agenda looks like this:

– dismantling of the Patriarchate;
– gender parity in all prestigious professions;
– sexual liberation of women (promiscuity and right to abortion);
– fight against the”culture of sexual violence” (rape culture);
– full gender neutrality or social equality.

Patriarchy is “a form of social organization in which the man is the main bearer of political power and moral authority, exercises control over property, and fathers in families have a leading position.” From the point of view of feminism, it is a system of subordination of women, through the construction of social gender roles. In 1968, one of the prominent leaders of the feminist movement Kate millet published a book “Politics of sexuality”.

Here is how her sister Mallory millet describes the events of those years:

“It was 1969. Kate invited me to a meeting at her friend Lily Karp’s house. They called it “consciousness-Raising,” a typical Communist exercise widely practiced in Mao era China. We sat down at a large table, and the President began a meeting resembling a Liturgy, reading a prayer in the Catholic Church.

But it was Marxism, the leftist Church copying religious practices.:

— Why are we here? she asked.
— To make a revolution! they answered.
— What kind of revolution?
— Cultural revolution! they answered in chorus.
— And how will we make a Cultural revolution? she asked in a demanding tone.
— By destroying the American family!
— How do we destroy the family?
— By destroying the American Patriarchate! — they answered on the verge of ecstasy
— How do we destroy the American Patriarchate?
— By taking his power!
— How are we going to do that?
— By destroying monogamy!
— How do we break up monogamy?

And there was a deafening response, and I found it hard to believe my own ears. Is this planet Earth? Who are these people?

— Promoting sexual promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality! they shouted in unison.

SODOM

After that, there was a long discussion on how to achieve these goals through the establishment of the National women’s Organization. It was clear that less than the destruction of Western society will not suit them. They planned to “infiltrate” all public institutions: the media, the education system, the legal system, the Executive system and even libraries.”

As we can see almost 50 years later, the overall plan was a success. Kate millet herself suffered from mental disorders, and ended up alone, away even from her friends in the “struggle”. Her last letters are full of bitterness and loneliness. However she ruined not only his own life. The feminist movement has done perhaps the greatest damage to the whole of European civilization.

From a feminist perspective, gender is a social construct

There was no difference between a man and a woman, so if a profession was dominated by men, that fact alone was proof of discrimination. Selectively, this principle applies only to prestigious and highly paid professions. So far, no one has heard of feminists fighting for parity in the coal industry or the construction industry.

However, for example, in Silicon Valley, every large company is forced to take on “solemn obligations” to hire a more “balanced” labor force (take the diversity pledge). You can take a look at the corresponding Apple and Google pages, for example. Companies pay recruiters twice as much for every woman or minority employee. If you are a white male, then in line for promotion your place is in the tail.

The Federal employment service has launched an investigation into the lack of women Directors of box office Hollywood films. Do not overlook sexual minorities, and quite possibly soon Captain America will change (it already has the petition).

Feminism has completely occupied Western universities

As part of the fight against the “culture of sexual violence”. Here’s what Christina Hoff Sommers says about it: “Moms and dads, fear for your sons. In universities, there has long been a “war on men”, where courses on gender studies and women’s rights groups explain to young girls that men are toxic. Many “educated women” have tasted the feminist Kool Aid. Girls at Yale and Harvard think they’re oppressed. This madness. Any girl can declare that she has been a victim of sexual violence, and without any proceedings, the need to provide evidence and the opportunity for the young man to protect himself. There are a huge number of cases when even a year or more after parting with his boyfriend, the girls suddenly said that he had committed sexual violence. The training and career of a young man came to an end.

It is worth noting that the parents of the girls also have something to worry about
Get the output of a convinced feminist, believing that promiscuity for a woman is the norm, the term “whore” is worthy of being proud of them. That abortion is a fundamental right of women, and that the root of all problems is men, and that society owes it all. Her father would be her mother’s oppressor, no matter how happy their family was. That motherhood is an obstacle in her life, and in General is a burden, and the family is an institution of oppression.

Denying the difference between men and women feminism denies the right of women to be feminine and to be in harmony with their nature. A woman is forced to make a more typical choice for men, depriving her of the natural joy given by nature. Studies show that modern Western women feel increasingly unhappy compared to the past.

Men are constantly attacked for any behavior typical of men

American and European boys have been treated as misbehaving girls since childhood. They are prohibited from playing cops or thieves, playing with imaginary guns or playing with any physical contact. School curricula are increasingly geared towards girls, as are programmes in colleges and universities. As a result, the performance of boys falls, fewer boys enter universities. Employers are already paying more women for the same work to avoid litigation.

This leads to the fact that men under 40 earn less than women, and as a result, women do not want to marry such men.

For example, due to the influx of migrants, sexual attacks against women have become increasingly common in Sweden. The number of rapes in the country has increased by almost 15 times compared to the prosperous 70. When some Swedish men decided to organize patrols at metro stations and trains to protect women from attacks, the Swedish feminists staged a storm in the press with the slogan “we are not your women, do not protect us.”

Not surprisingly, in Rotterdam, where the local Pakistani community systematically sexually assaulted local adolescents, more than 1,400 girls for 11 years, neither local residents nor the police took any action. When thousands of women were attacked on new year’s eve in Cologne and other European cities, in addition to the fact that the local press hid this fact for 5 days, in fact, women were not protected by the police or their husbands or fathers or brothers. This is the result of squeezing “toxic” masculinity out of Western men for two generations.

It is worth noting the depressing state of the institution of the family

As already mentioned above, the destruction of marriage is seen by feminists as the main goal of their movement. Today in America, almost half of children are born out of wedlock. (8) Feminism encourages women to be single mothers (if it does not appeal to child-free). Marriage laws deprive men of virtually all their rights, leaving them all the responsibilities of a financial nature. In France, a man does not even have the right to genetic examination if he wants to prove that the woman gave birth to a child not from him — but he is obliged to pay alimony. Woman enough to say that she fears her husband that recently did Angelina Jolie announcing her divorce from brad pitt. This is the standard wording that lawyers recommend, and which gives a woman the maximum advantage in divorce. The woman have nothing to prove, the husband is guilty a priori. No wonder fewer and fewer men want to get married. First of all, it hits the melting layer of “old-fashioned” women and men who want to start a family and raise children. Sexual promiscuity among women creates too many temptations for husbands, and the law makes marriage a very risky occupation. Women who choose to be a mother and look after children and home are subject to public censure. Men are deprived of the opportunity to be the support of the family.

It is worth noting the depressing state of the institution of the family

As already mentioned above, the destruction of marriage is seen by feminists as the main goal of their movement. Today in America, almost half of children are born out of wedlock. (8) Feminism encourages women to be single mothers (if it does not appeal to child-free). Marriage laws deprive men of virtually all their rights, leaving them all the responsibilities of a financial nature. In France, a man does not even have the right to genetic examination if he wants to prove that the woman gave birth to a child not from him — but he is obliged to pay alimony. Woman enough to say that she fears her husband that recently did Angelina Jolie announcing her divorce from brad pitt. This is the standard wording that lawyers recommend, and which gives a woman the maximum advantage in divorce. The woman have nothing to prove, the husband is guilty a priori. No wonder fewer and fewer men want to get married. First of all, it hits the melting layer of “old-fashioned” women and men who want to start a family and raise children. Sexual promiscuity among women creates too many temptations for husbands, and the law makes marriage a very risky occupation. Women who choose to be a mother and look after children and home are subject to public censure. Men are deprived of the opportunity to be the support of the family.



You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

code

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.